Wetlaufer, S. (1994), The team that wasn’t 代写

100%原创包过,高质量代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信：273427

Wetlaufer, S. (1994), The team that wasn’t 代写

Assessment 2. Report + Reflection on Teamwork

Essentials:

Weighting: 35%

Due date: Monday 9 th October by 4pm (Week 9),

Length: Report: 1000 words (including in-text references but excluding

reference list), plus;

Reflection on teamwork: 300 words (no references required)

Topic: Understanding groups and managing teams

Case study brief:

Wetlaufer, S. (1994), The team that wasn’t 代写

Wetlaufer, S. (1994), The team that wasn’t, Harvard Business Review, November –

December, pp. 1 – 4. (Case study can be accessed on iLearn)

Students must answer the question posed in the case study: “Why doesn’t this team

work?”

Students will succeed in answering the brief if they:

 identify a major problem (problems) presented in the case study

 discuss reasons for this problem (or these problems). Use relevant theories

where appropriate.

 discuss possible solutions to this problem (or these problems). Use relevant

theories where appropriate.

 NB: students must note that it will not suffice to answer the question of why the

team does not work by only identifying or pointing to (describing) apparent

issues. Your analysis should explain why these issues are problematic and how

can they be rectified (solutions).

“Reflection on teamwork” brief:

Reflection is about questioning one’s experiences in pursuit of learning and growing.

In your reflective statement, the student should answer the following question:

 How can both your knowledge about and your experience of teamwork

acquired during this course assist you in your current or future career?

Aims and Objectives:

This assessment targets the development of students’ analytical, problem-solving,

research and reflective skills. This assessment expects students to:

 Answer the brief (the question posed in the case study and expectations

articulated in the “case study brief” on pp. 5-6 of this Assessment Guide).

 Demonstrate an understanding of teamwork and the challenges and

opportunities it presents for managers and team members.

 Demonstrate ability to find solutions to an identified problem.

 Reflect on their own experiences of teamwork.

Report format and reference guidelines

In all reports students must:

 use 1.5 spacing

 use 2.5 cm margins on top, bottom and on each side

 use Times New Roman or Arial, font size 12.

 insert page numbers

 insert student name and number on each page in a footer or header

 cite at least three (3) academic sources (NB: no references required in the

reflective statement)

 use the Harvard method for citations

 use the designated structure consisting of introduction, body (under headings)

and conclusion

Report instructions

Report (1000 words)

In following the approved structure, students should:

a) in the Introduction (up to 250 words) – introduce the brief and how it is

tackled in the report. Tip: a report introduction should include a brief overview

of identified challenges, the argumentation provided under each heading, as

well as conclusive thoughts).

b) in the Body of Report (under Headings that students create) (up to 650

words) – analyse and evaluate the task at hand. Tip: think carefully about the

headings because they define the structure of your argumentation; Students

have freedom in how they organise their analysis. Headings could be based

around challenges, or stakeholders, or solutions, or anything else that students

find useful to succeed in identifying the real problem(s) behind teamwork failure

and the subsequent solutions.

d) in the Conclusion (up to 100 words) – summarise the key points identified in

the report. Tip: conclusion contains no new information. It summarises student

insights/recommendations and investigations performed in the body of the

report.

e) in the Reference List (is not included in the word count) – accurately and

consistently cite all references mentioned within the text and make sure that

citations in the Reference List are cited in the text of the Report.

Reflection on Teamwork (300 words)

The “Reflective” statement is a half a page document attached to the end of the report.

This means that it is inserted after the reference list. The aim of this statement is to

showcase your understanding of teamwork as it applies to your experience. No

references are required in your reflection.

NB: Word count for structural parts of the Report are suggestive and can vary as long

as the word limit of 1000 words (+/-10%) is met. However, your “Reflection” on

teamwork should not exceed 300 words.

“BESS submission package” should include (in the following order):

 a completed and signed Individual Assessment Cover Sheet (available via

iLearn and the FBE web page). Students are responsible for providing the cover

sheet

 a printed copy of the Report

 a Reference List

 a Reflection statement on Teamwork

 a printed Turnitin originality report, including word count (NB: The first Turnitin

submission will generate the originality report immediately. Subsequent

submissions to Turnitin may take up to 24 hours for the originality report to be

generated. Be mindful of this and ensure you submit with plenty of time to

submit the hard copy to BESS).

 a printed copy of the Report Marking Guide. Failure to attach the marking guide

may result in receiving delayed feedback.

NB: the “package” should be stapled. No sleeves or fancy covers should be used.

Submission Details:

All students must submit their reports (case study analysis + reflection on teamwork)

electronically through Turnitin using the link on iLearn, and in hard copy to BESS (E4B

106) by 4.00pm on the due date. Hard copies must be identical to the electronic

version submitted.

Late Submissions:

Late reports must also be submitted through Turnitin and hard copy should be

submitted to BESS in building E4B to be date stamped and forwarded to your tutor for

marking. No extensions will be granted. There will be a deduction of 20% of the total

available marks (i.e. 7 marks) made from the total awarded mark for each 24-hour

period or part thereof that the submission is late (for example, 25 hours late in

submission incurs a 40% or 14 marks penalty). This penalty does not apply for cases

in which an application for disruption to studies (DTS) is made and approved. No

submission will be accepted after feedback have been posted/given in

lectures/classes.

Marking Criteria:

Students must refer to the Report Marking Guide on iLearn, which sets out the criteria

and standards against which their report will be marked.

This Assessment Task relates to the following Learning Outcomes:

 Describe and apply fundamental management theories and concepts to

business operation.

 Critically examine organisational and management practices.

 Analyse management challenges, problems and issues and construct

practical solutions.

 Evaluate the purpose and value of teamwork and working collaboratively.

BBA102

Principles of Management:

Assessment Guide

Session 2, 2017

Please read this assessment guide carefully at the start of session. It contains useful

information about the assessment tasks in this course. This document should be read

in conjunction with the unit guide.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion of this subject students should be able to:

1. Describe and apply fundamental management theories and concepts to

business operation.

2. Critically examine organisational and management practices.

3. Analyse management challenges, problems and issues and construct

practical solutions.

4. Evaluate the purpose and value of teamwork and working collaboratively.

Assessment overview

Name

Weighing Submission due

Essay (1200 words)

25%

Week 6, 04/09/17, Monday, 4pm

Report (1000 words) + reflection

on teamwork (300 words)

35%

Week 9, 09/10/17, Monday, 4pm

Final Examination

40%

University examination period

BBA102

Principles of Management

Assessment Guide

Assessment 1. Essay

Essentials:

Weighting: 25%

Due date: Monday 4 th September by 4pm (Week 6)

Length: 1200 words (including in-text references; excluding reference list)

Topic: Understanding organisational culture and structure

Essay brief:

Flight Centre is an iconic Australian organisation famous for its distinct culture and

unique organisational structure. Using relevant theories, explain how the

organisational culture and structure of Flight Centre are intertwined.

Aims and Objectives:

This assessment targets development of students’ critical thinking skills and

encourages students to:

 Understand the complex nature of contemporary organisations

 Provide a critical perspective of the academic literature on a topic

 Construct a sustained argument in response to the question

 Utilise and conform to the principles of academic rigour in the production of an

acceptable, formal response to the question.

Essay format and reference guidelines

In all essays students must:

 use 1.5 spacing

 use 2.5 cm margins on top, bottom and on each side

 use Times New Roman or Arial, font size 12.

 insert page numbers

 insert student name and number on each page in a footer or header

 cite at least four (4) academic sources

 use the Harvard method for citations

 adhere to the word limit of 1200 words (+/- 10% allowance)

 use the structure listed below (consisting of introduction, body and conclusion).

Essay instructions

In following the approved structure, students should:

a) in the Introduction (up to 150 words) – introduce the brief and how it is

tackled in the essay. Tip: an introduction is written last – after the essay has

been written – to provide a lead as to what will follow.

b) in the Body of Essay (up to 950 words):

i. briefly and creatively describe concepts of organisational culture and

organisational structure. Tip: use imaginative comparisons, metaphors,

humour, poetry and the like. This can foster student creativity.

ii. explain the culture and structure in Flight Centre applying theoretical

models (at least one per concept). Tip: use relevant theories.

iii. evaluate how the unique organisational structure of Flight Centre is

intertwined with the company’s organisational culture. Tip: learn to ask

questions to stimulate your analysis: Does structure inform/influence

culture or the other way around? How are they inter-

connected/intertwined? If change were required, what would you change

first, culture or structure? Why?

Provide examples and other evidence to substantiate (back up) your

arguments.

c) in the Conclusion (up to 100 words) – summarise the key points made in your

essay. Tip: a conclusion contains no new information. It summarises student

insights/recommendations and investigations performed in the body of the

essay.

The “BESS submission package” should include (in the following order):

 a completed and signed Individual Assessment Cover Sheet (available via

iLearn and the FBE web page). Students are responsible for providing the cover

sheet.

 a printed copy of the essay

 a Reference List

 a printed Turnitin originality report, including word count (NB: The first Turnitin

submission will generate the originality report immediately. Subsequent

submissions to Turnitin may take up to 24 hours for the originality report to be

generated. Be mindful of this and ensure you submit with plenty of time to

submit the hard copy to BESS).

 A printed copy of the Essay Marking Guide. Failure to attach the marking guide

may result in receiving delayed feedback.

NB: the “package” should be stapled. No sleeves or fancy covers should be used.

Submission Details:

All students must submit their essays electronically through Turnitin using the link on

iLearn, and in hard copy to BESS (E4B 106) by 4.00pm on the due date. Hard copies

must be identical to the electronic version submitted.

Late Submissions:

Late essays must also be submitted through Turnitin and a hard copy should be

submitted to BESS in building E4B to be date stamped and forwarded to your tutor for

marking. No extensions will be granted. There will be a deduction of 20% of the total

available marks (i.e. 5 marks) made from the total awarded mark for each 24-hour

period or part thereof that the submission is late (for example, 25 hours late in

submission incurs a 40% or 10 marks penalty). This penalty does not apply for cases

in which an application for disruption to studies (DTS) is made and approved. No

submission will be accepted after feedback have been posted/given in

lectures/classes.

Marking Criteria:

Students must refer to the Essay Marking Guide on iLearn, which sets out the criteria

and standards against which their essay will be marked.

This Assessment Task relates to the following Learning Outcomes:

 Describe and apply fundamental management theories and concepts to

business operation.

Wetlaufer, S. (1994), The team that wasn’t 代写

 Critically examine organisational and management practices.

Assessment 2. Report + Reflection on Teamwork

Essentials:

Weighting: 35%

Due date: Monday 9 th October by 4pm (Week 9),

Length: Report: 1000 words (including in-text references but excluding

reference list), plus;

Reflection on teamwork: 300 words (no references required)

Topic: Understanding groups and managing teams

Case study brief:

Wetlaufer, S. (1994), The team that wasn’t, Harvard Business Review, November –

December, pp. 1 – 4. (Case study can be accessed on iLearn)

Students must answer the question posed in the case study: “Why doesn’t this team

work?”

Students will succeed in answering the brief if they:

 identify a major problem (problems) presented in the case study

 discuss reasons for this problem (or these problems). Use relevant theories

where appropriate.

 discuss possible solutions to this problem (or these problems). Use relevant

theories where appropriate.

 NB: students must note that it will not suffice to answer the question of why the

team does not work by only identifying or pointing to (describing) apparent

issues. Your analysis should explain why these issues are problematic and how

can they be rectified (solutions).

“Reflection on teamwork” brief:

Reflection is about questioning one’s experiences in pursuit of learning and growing.

In your reflective statement, the student should answer the following question:

 How can both your knowledge about and your experience of teamwork

acquired during this course assist you in your current or future career?

Aims and Objectives:

This assessment targets the development of students’ analytical, problem-solving,

research and reflective skills. This assessment expects students to:

 Answer the brief (the question posed in the case study and expectations

articulated in the “case study brief” on pp. 5-6 of this Assessment Guide).

 Demonstrate an understanding of teamwork and the challenges and

opportunities it presents for managers and team members.

 Demonstrate ability to find solutions to an identified problem.

 Reflect on their own experiences of teamwork.

Report format and reference guidelines

In all reports students must:

 use 1.5 spacing

 use 2.5 cm margins on top, bottom and on each side

 use Times New Roman or Arial, font size 12.

 insert page numbers

 insert student name and number on each page in a footer or header

 cite at least three (3) academic sources (NB: no references required in the

reflective statement)

 use the Harvard method for citations

 use the designated structure consisting of introduction, body (under headings)

and conclusion

Report instructions

Report (1000 words)

In following the approved structure, students should:

a) in the Introduction (up to 250 words) – introduce the brief and how it is

tackled in the report. Tip: a report introduction should include a brief overview

of identified challenges, the argumentation provided under each heading, as

well as conclusive thoughts).

b) in the Body of Report (under Headings that students create) (up to 650

words) – analyse and evaluate the task at hand. Tip: think carefully about the

headings because they define the structure of your argumentation; Students

have freedom in how they organise their analysis. Headings could be based

around challenges, or stakeholders, or solutions, or anything else that students

find useful to succeed in identifying the real problem(s) behind teamwork failure

and the subsequent solutions.

d) in the Conclusion (up to 100 words) – summarise the key points identified in

the report. Tip: conclusion contains no new information. It summarises student

insights/recommendations and investigations performed in the body of the

report.

e) in the Reference List (is not included in the word count) – accurately and

consistently cite all references mentioned within the text and make sure that

citations in the Reference List are cited in the text of the Report.

Reflection on Teamwork (300 words)

The “Reflective” statement is a half a page document attached to the end of the report.

This means that it is inserted after the reference list. The aim of this statement is to

showcase your understanding of teamwork as it applies to your experience. No

references are required in your reflection.

NB: Word count for structural parts of the Report are suggestive and can vary as long

as the word limit of 1000 words (+/-10%) is met. However, your “Reflection” on

teamwork should not exceed 300 words.

“BESS submission package” should include (in the following order):

 a completed and signed Individual Assessment Cover Sheet (available via

iLearn and the FBE web page). Students are responsible for providing the cover

sheet

 a printed copy of the Report

 a Reference List

 a Reflection statement on Teamwork

 a printed Turnitin originality report, including word count (NB: The first Turnitin

submission will generate the originality report immediately. Subsequent

submissions to Turnitin may take up to 24 hours for the originality report to be

generated. Be mindful of this and ensure you submit with plenty of time to

submit the hard copy to BESS).

 a printed copy of the Report Marking Guide. Failure to attach the marking guide

may result in receiving delayed feedback.

NB: the “package” should be stapled. No sleeves or fancy covers should be used.

Submission Details:

All students must submit their reports (case study analysis + reflection on teamwork)

electronically through Turnitin using the link on iLearn, and in hard copy to BESS (E4B

106) by 4.00pm on the due date. Hard copies must be identical to the electronic

version submitted.

Wetlaufer, S. (1994), The team that wasn’t 代写