NUR1110 Reflective Essay 护理 assignment 代写

100%原创包过,高质量代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信：273427

NUR1110 Reflective Essay 护理 assignment 代写

NUR1110: Assessment Task 4 -Reflective Essay

Reflection and critical thinking are integral skills for professional nurses and midwives to develop. For

Assessment Task 4 you are asked to demonstrate your development as a reflective learner by

discussing reflection and critical thinking supported by scholarly references and applying your

knowledge to a learning experience.

In Week 9, 10 or 11 you will be/were involved in an e-Simulation exercise which may/may not have

exposed you to an experience you have never had before. In the Simulation you were asked to

suspend judgement and just be in the experience. For this exercise, you are asked to deeply reflect

on your experience of the e-Simulation as if it had been an actual, rather than a simulated experience.

If you had really been in that situation, how would you reflect on the learning from that experience?

The Simulation will bring together learning from a number of your core units so that you can reflect on

the communication, cultural and other aspects of the experience, and how the experience may help to

inform your future practice as a health professional.

You are required to use the Gibbs Reflective Cycle (1988) as the framework from which to write

your reflective assessment piece. Below is a representation of the six (6) stages in the cycle. We were

introduced to this model in Week 2 and will be revising the model in Workshops before the

assessment due date.

To assist you with this activity further the marking rubric also reflects the six (6) stages of the Gibbs

Reflective Cycle (1988). See following. Please also note the formatting instructions on Moodle under

Assessment Task 4- Reflective Essay section.

Assessment Criteria Student ID:__________________

Criterion High Distinction (80-

100%)

Distinction (70-79%) Credit (60-69%) Pass (50-59%) Fail (< 50%)

Introduction

Imaginative introduction

which outlines the

event/incident scope

and discusses the

framework being used

Interesting introduction

of topic where

event/incident scope

and framework being

used identified.

Briefly, states the

event/incident Defines the

scope and context of the

paper.

Too long or too short.

Some material in

introduction belongs in the

body. Key information

missing

Rambling and unfocused

or no introduction at all

Description

/10

Describes the event or

incident with numerous

supporting details which

are organised logically

and coherently. The

description provides the

context and background

for reflective writing

Describes the event or

incident with some

supporting details and

examples in an

organised manner. The

description provides a

context for reflection.

Describes the event or

incident with few details or

examples in a somewhat

organised manner.

Describes the event or

incident poorly with few or

no details.

Does not describe the

event or incident.

Feelings

/10

A comprehensive

discussion of

behaviours, feelings and

reactions. Detailed

exploration and analysis

of their implications.

A comprehensive

discussion of

behaviours, feelings and

reactions. Detailed

exploration and analysis

of their implications

Some discussion of

behaviours, feelings and

reactions. Some

exploration and analysis

of their implications

Discusses behaviours,

feelings and reactions

with some details. Minimal

exploration and analysis

of implications

Does not discuss

behaviours, feelings and

reactions. Does not

explore or analyse their

implications

Evaluation

/10

Identification of issues

which require action and

comprehensive

discussion of them

Identification of issues,

which require action and

discussion of them.

Identification of issues,

which require action.

Minimal appraisal of

issues

No appraisal of issues

Analysis

/10

Discussion of analysis of

historical and social

factors influencing the

situation using scholarly

literature.

Description of analysis

of historical and social

factors influencing the

situation using scholarly

literature.

Some evidence of

analysis of historical and

social factors influencing

the situation. Some

reference to scholarly

literature.

Minimal evidence of

analysis of historical and

social factors influencing

the situation. Minimal

reference to scholarly

literature.

No evidence of analysis of

historical and social

factors influencing the

situation. No use of

scholarly literature.

Conclusion

/10

Insightfully relates

concepts and ideas from

multiple sources; uses

new information to

enhance chosen

solution; recognizes

missing information;

correctly identifies

potential effects of new

information.

Accurately relates

concepts and ideas from

multiple sources; uses

new information to

enhance chosen

solution; correctly

identifies potential

effects of new

information.

Inaccurately or

incompletely relates

concepts and ideas from

multiple sources; shallow

determination of effect of

new information on

chosen solution.

Poorly integrates

information from more

than one source to

support chosen solution;

Incorrectly predicts the

effect of new information

on chosen solution.

Does not identify new

information for chosen

solution.

Action plan

/10

Thoroughly identifies

and addresses key

aspects of the problem

and insightfully uses

evidence from analysis

to support and defend

potentially valid

solutions.

Identifies and addresses

key aspects of the

problem and uses

evidence from analysis

to develop potentially

valid conclusions or

solutions.

Identifies and addresses

some aspects of the

problem; develops

possible conclusions or

solutions using some

inappropriate opinions

and irrelevant information

from analysis.

Identifies and addresses

only one aspect of the

problem or develops invalid

conclusions or solutions

based on opinion or

irrelevant information.

Does not select and

defend a solution.

Conclusion

of reflection

/10

Identifies strengths and

weaknesses in own

thinking: recognizes

personal assumptions,

values and perspectives,

compares to others’, and

evaluates them in the

context of alternate

points of view.

Identifies strengths and

weaknesses in own

thinking: recognizes

personal assumptions,

values and perspectives,

compares to others’,

with some comparisons

of alternate points of

view.

Identifies some personal

assumptions, values, and

perspectives;

recognizes some

assumptions, values and

perspectives of others;

shallow comparisons of

alternate points of view.

Identifies some personal

assumptions, values, and

perspectives;

does not consider

alternate points of view.

Does not reflect on own

thinking

The student

writes clearly

and

coherently,

in a style

appropriate

for a critical

reflection.

/10

Well written piece which

presents a coherent and

well argued critical

reflection

A coherent piece of

writing in which there is

some evidence of critical

reflection

Adequately written for

clarity though there is no

critical reflection

presented.

Writing which conveys

basic information but in a

way that is difficult to

understand and not well

structured to convey a

coherent critical reflection

Writing which is

unstructured, unclear and

disorganised.

References

including

research

(recent

studies are

best), policy

documents

(from

relevant

bodies)

and/or

theory (from

academic

sources) to

support

analysis.

APA 6th

referencing

guidelines

clearly

demonstrate

/10

Supported by research

studies), policy

documents and/or

theory to support

analysis.APA 6th

referencing guidelines

used.

Some references used

to support the analysis.

APA 6th referencing

guidelines used, minor

errors in reference list

and/ or in-text.

References are provided

but are not recent or

relevant publications, or

do not support the

student’s analysis.

APA 6th referencing

guidelines used, major

errors in reference list

and/ or in-text.

Limited number of

references provided,

some from non-scholarly

sources.

Referencing does not

comply with APA 6th

guidelines.

Few or no relevant

reference.

No attempt at referencing

or referencing does not

permit sourcing of

documents mentioned in

your reflection..

Conclusion

Analytical and clear

NUR1110 Reflective Essay 护理 assignment 代写

conclusion well-

grounded in literature

but stated in own words.

Introduces no new ideas

Good development

shown in summary of

key points & ideas

included in the body &

based on literature

Evidence of conclusion

grounded in literature

Limited evidence of

conclusion based on

literature

Unsubstantiated

conclusion, or no

conclusion at all

Marked by: _____________ Moderated by_____________________

(if required)

Date _________ Raw Mark /100

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

NUR1110 Reflective Essay 护理 assignment 代写