Lighting Design Assignment Mc Donald 213 ParramattaRd 代写
100%原创包过,高质量代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信：273427
DESA1004 Assignment Mc Donald 213 Parramatta Rd 代写
Lighting Design Assignment Mc Donald 213 ParramattaRd 代写
Assignment 2 (60%): Evaluation of Lighting Design. This assignment will develop your ability to
identify and develop lighting design strategies for architectural spaces.
Visit the interior of your nearest McDonalds restaurant. If a McDonalds is inaccessible to you,
contact your lecturer to discuss alternative spaces to visit.
Conduct a critique of the lighting of the space.
Your analysis should include the following:
A brief description of the space,
An analysis of the function of a space, in terms of the visual tasks required,
A critique of the effectiveness of the current lighting, and
A suggested alternative approach.
The aim of this assignment is to demonstrate your understanding of the information for this course
and your ability to conduct your own academic research.
Submit as a fully referenced (APA format) essay of 1000 words.
Word limit does not include referencing.
Assignment 2 due:
3rd November, 11:59pm
DESA1004 Assignment Mc Donald 213 Parramatta Rd 代写
If you need to get your final results quickly (because you are planning to graduate soon after this course
is completed) you will need to submit assignment 2 by 11:59pm on Friday 14th October.
Please see the following link for marking criteria
DESA1004 Assignment 2
Examples of characteristics of responses that earn different grades are given below.
Since completed assessment items may show a different pattern of strengths and
weaknesses (e.g. originality, but poor expression), actual grades may not map
perfectly to the criteria.
High Distinction (85%-100%)
• An immensely creative and innovative analysis based on flawless knowledge
of relevant course modules and the examination of unique research
• Flawless demonstration of academic writing ability, which includes, but are not
limited to:
Exceptional formatting (as requested in the assignment instructions)
An appropriate balance of descriptive, analytical and persuasive writing
A thoroughly planned organisational structure
• Demonstration of a thoroughly considered response to all aspects of the
assignment instructions
• Outstanding knowledge of posts on the elearning Discussion Board
• A concise relationship between the selected interior and your knowledge of
light
Distinction (75%-84%)
• A creative and/or innovative analysis based on excellent knowledge of course
modules and self guided research
• Excellent demonstration of academic writing ability; which includes, but are
not limited to:
Excellent formatting (as requested in the assignment instructions)
A good balance of descriptive, analytical and persuasive writing
A well planned organisational structure
• Demonstration of a well considered response to all aspects of the assignment
instructions
• Detailed knowledge of posts on the elearning Discussion Board
• A close relationship between the selected interior and your knowledge of light
Credit (65%-74%)
• A clear and logical analysis based on good knowledge of course modules and
self guided research
• Good demonstration of academic writing ability, which includes, but are not
limited to:
Good formatting (as requested in the assignment instructions)
A reasonable balance of descriptive, analytical and persuasive writing
A planned organisational structure
• Response all aspects of the assignment instructions
• Good knowledge of posts on the elearning Discussion Board
• A clear relationship between the selected interior and your knowledge of light
Pass (50%-64%)
• Knowledge of most aspects of applicable course modules and demonstration
of relevant credible research
• Demonstration of academic writing skills, which includes, but are not limited
to:
Reasonable formatting (as requested in the assignment instructions)
An attempt to present aspects of analytical and persuasive writing
An organisational structure as expected at a tertiary level
• A response to almost all aspects of the assignment instructions
• Reasonable knowledge of posts on the elearning Discussion Board
• If images or diagrams are used, they form a relationship to the discussion and
could not be considered superfluous
• General knowledge examples are not used excessively
• A reasonable relationship between the selected interior and your knowledge
of light
Fail (< 50%)
The completed assessment item fails to demonstrate satisfactory achievement of
one or more of the learning outcomes:
• Inability to present knowledge or understanding of most aspects of applicable
course modules
• Vast quantities of the essay is obscured due to poor comprehension skills
• Little or no demonstration of academic/credible research
• Poor demonstration of the capacity to interpret and or follow assignment
instructions
• Superfluous use or diagrams, images and/or examples
• Severe word limit breaches
• No clear relationship between your knowledge of light and the selected
interior
Resubmissions
Student who fails this assignment may resubmit within two weeks of receiving
feedback. If the resubmission would earn a pass or better, the student will receive a
pass (50%) for this assignment.
DESA1004 Assignment Mc Donald 213 Parramatta Rd 代写
Lighting Design Assignment Mc Donald 213 ParramattaRd 代写
