代写 MGNT803 management assignment
MGNT803 Assessment 3 Rubric
Assessment 3
Authentic Tasks
Topic : Critical Analysis of Journal Articles
Length 800 words
Weighting 30%
Due Date 28 Jun 2016 (Tuesday in Trimester 2 Week 7)
Final Submission Time: 5:00pm
Type of Collaboration Individual Assessment
Marking Criteria Refer to Assessment 3 Rubric in Moodle Style and Format Short essay Assessment Submission Online Via Moodle Assessment Return Online via Moodle/Turnitin Detailed Information This assessment requires students to read and critique two journal articles about a selected topic from weeks 6-10 of the lecture program. To complete this assessment students must:
• Download (from Moodle), read and understand the Assessment 3 Rubric. • Select a research topic from the lecture topics listed for weeks 6 to 10 of the lecture program. • Read the academic journal article listed adjacent to the selected topic as outlined in the lecture program. • Individually research the academic literature via Google Scholar or library journal databases and select and read a second academic journal on the selected topic that is NOT on the list of assigned readings. • Prepare a written critical analysis of both academic journal articles and submit it to Turnitin via the subject Moodle site. • All references to be in Harvard format .
MGNT803 Subject Outline Trimester 2, 2016 Page 15 of 19
Notes:
• For further detailed information and report template for this assessment please refer to Assessment 3 Information Sheet in Moodle. • All students in this subject should be aware that, as well as using the originality information provided by Turnitin, the teaching staff may randomly audit any or all assessment tasks for originality. This may include inviting students to attend an interview with the lecturer or lead subject coordinator to discuss their submissions before the release of assessment task marks and final subject grades. • The tutorial activities for this subject are designed to support students in developing the necessary skills to complete assessments. It is essential to complete all tutorial activities as directed.
代写 MGNT803 management assignment
Student Name: Student Number:
|
Key to performance level against criteria elements Excellent - consistently outstanding shows additional insights or originality evident. Very good- with useful critical insights frequently demonstrated Satisfactory -accurately and provides basic interpretations Limited – lack of understanding or misinterpretations Very limited - low level, numerouserrors of accuracy, lack of understanding or misinterpretations; Unsatisfactory - fails to meet minimum standard of quality. |
Excellent 81-100% |
Very good 61- 80% |
Satisfactory 41 -60% |
Poor 21-40% |
Very Limited 1 – 20% |
Unsatisfac. 0% |
Mark | |
|
Knowledgeable understanding of two research articles for an OB topic (worth 3 marks) · One article is selected from Weeks 2-4 set readings; one is independently researched. · The OB topic selected is evident and elaborated upon throughout the annotated bibliography. · Main arguments from articles are correctly identified. · Statements on any theories mentioned in the articles are accurately interpreted. · The purpose, and type of research and key findings from both articles are accurately described. |
/3 |
|||||||
|
Critical analysis of one selected research article (this section is worth 12 marks) · A succinct and accurate summary of the research article content and purpose is provided. · A critique of the article’s main arguments is provided using justifications from the article data and/or professional experience. · An explanation of the relevance or value of the article for the OB topic is provided. · Insights from personal/professional or other subjects/experiences add further value to demonstrating critical writing and perspectives on the issues identified in the research article. |
|
|
|
|
/12 |
|||
|
Critical comparative analysis of two research articles (this section is worth 12 marks) · A comparison between the two research articles is explicitly provided. · Strengths/weaknesses, advantages/disadvantages or any other bases of comparisons are justified clearly with data evidence or through logical statements. · A perspective on how the two research articles contribute to better understanding of the OB topic is provided. · Insights from personal/professional or other subjects/experiences add further value to demonstrating critical writing on the OB topic and its trends. |
|
|
|
|
/12 |
|||
|
Proficient academic writing style (this section is worth 3 marks) · Uses clear and logical paragraph structure and presentation of submission. · Uses accurate business terminology for the selected topic with correct English expressions that are free of spelling and grammatical errors. · In-text and reference list citations conform to Harvard referencing style. |
|
|
|
/3 |
||||
