Assessment | Weight | Due | Learning Outcomes Assessed | Graduate Attributes Assessed | CPA Knowledge Area and Item Assessed* | |
INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT–5 Fortnightly quizzes consisting of 20 multiple choice questions. These will take place on Moodle each week of Semester 3. | 20% | Weeks 2 to 6 | LO 1, 2,3 & 4 | GA 1, 3, 5, 6 &9 | KA 3.1 & 3.2 | |
RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT AND PRESENTATION – Students will research and present a current issue in accounting and critically analyse the impact it has had on financial reporting. Assignments must be ready for presentation in week 5 |
30% | Week 5 | LO 1, 2,3 & 4 | GA 1, 3,4,6 & 9 | KA 3.1, 3.2 & 3.3 | |
Final examination | 50% | TBA | LO 1 – 4 inclusive | GA 1, 3 4, 6 & 9 | KA 3.1, 3.2 & 3.3 | |
Total | 100% | |||||
Week | Topic | Text reference and set readings | Tutorial/Readings |
Week 1 |
1. The nature, construction and verification of theories 2.Measurement in accounting |
Chapter 1 Chapter 5 |
1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.8, 1.17 |
Week 2 |
3. Normative accounting theory 4. Financial reporting environment 5. The standard setting process |
Chapter 6 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 |
Test on topics 1 5.13, 5.10, 5.14, 5.28 6.10, 6.9, 6.19, 6.28 |
Week 3 |
6. Positive accounting theory 7. International accounting 8. The history of accounting: Theoretical perspectives. |
Chapter 7 Chapter 4 Readings on moodle |
Test on topics 2 & 3 2.12, 2.13, 2.18, 2.25 Chapter 3 TBA 7.6, 7.11, 7.23, 7.34 |
Week 4 |
9. Behavioural research in accounting 10.Critical perspectives in accounting |
Chapter 11 Chapter 12 |
Test on topic 4 and 5 4.6, 4.10, 4.19, 4.20 Readings on Behavioural research on moodle |
Week 5 |
11. Stakeholder, legitimacy and institutional theories 12. Social and environmental theories Case Study Submission and Presentation |
Chapter 8 Chapter 9 |
Test on topics 6 & 7 Case study presentations 12.2, 12.3, 12.5, 12.6 8.1, 8.37, 9.6, 9.10, 9.28, 8.14 |
Week 6 | Revision Week | Test on topic 10 | |
Week 7 | Exam Week |
Criteria |
High Distinction 80% - |
Distinction 70%- 79% |
Credit 60-69% |
Pass 50-59% |
Fail 0-49% |
Discussion on relationship between sustainability issues and Toyota’s mission and vision statement. 5 marks |
Sophisticated analysis of the relationship. Identifies and addresses key aspects of the relationships. Addresses implications and consequences. Identifies facts and relevant information correctly. | Broad analysis of the relationships. Identifies and addresses key aspects of the relationships. Addresses implications and consequences. Identifies facts and relevant information correctly | Explanation of the relationships. Identifies and addresses some aspects of the relationships. Identifies some implications and consequences. Most facts and relevant information correct | Description of the relationship with some problems and consequences identified Some facts and relevant information in-correct | Explanations of the relationships are inaccurate or incomplete.. |
Identification of stakeholders and how they are engaged in sustainability issues. 5 marks |
Sophisticated identification of stakeholders and how they can be engaged. Insightfully uses facts and relevant evidence from the research literature to support stakeholder’s impact on sustainability. |
Uses facts and relevant evidence to support the impact of sustainability on stakeholders |
Most of the ways the stakeholders are impacted. |
Some analysis of the way stakeholders are impacted and engaged. |
Reference to some stakeholders and how they are engaged in sustainability issues. |
Identification and discussion of governance mechanisms that effect sustainability. 5 marks |
Identification of governance mechanisms that effect sustainability is insightful, complete and draws on relevant research. | Governance mechanisms identification and how it effects sustainability is well developed and draws on research. | Governance mechanism identification and its impact on sustainability is clear and valid and draws on research. | Some relevant governance mechanisms identified with some inaccuracies |
Relevant governance mechanisms are not identified or are inaccurate. |
Analysis on the linkages between sustainability and risk management systems. 4 marks |
Linkages between sustainability and risk management systems critically analysed | Linkages between sustainability and risk management systems identified and discussed | Linkages between sustainability and risk management systems identified and limited discussion | Some linkages identified with some inaccuracies | Links are not identified or are inaccurate. |
Guidance Toyota has used in implementing environmental and social performance and reporting system. 3 marks |
Thorough outline of any guidance that has been used in implementing environmental and social performance and reporting systems. | Detailed outline of any guidance that has been used in implementing environmental and social performance and reporting systems. | Comprehensive outline of any guidance that has been used in implementing environmental and social performance and reporting systems. | Some mention of guidance that has been used in implementing environmental and social performance and reporting systems. | No mention or inaccurate outline of guidance that has been used in implementing environmental and social performance and reporting systems. |
Use or relevant literature including use of current journals 2 mark |
Researched widely and relevantly from the current literature. Has used a minimum of 8 different in text references. |
Researched widely and relevantly from the current literature. Has used up to 8 different in-text references. |
Researched from relevant current literature. Up to 5 different in-text references |
Researched from relevant literature with less than five different in-text references. Some referencing not current. |
Very little research and only up to three different in-text references. Has drawn heavily on only one or two main sources.. |
Presentation and referencing 1 mark |
Introductions creative and analytical and conclusions concise and persuasive. No grammatical or spelling errors. Correct use of referencing style and bibliography | Introduction clear and analytical. Conclusions concise. Very few grammatical and spelling errors. Correct use of referencing style and bibliography | Introduction clear. Conclusions draw together most arguments in the paper. Some spelling and grammatical mistakes. Some referencing errors. Bibliography present | Introduction fails to identify the main issue and arguments to be explored. Frequent spelling and grammatical mistakes. Conclusions unclear. Referencing incorrect. | No introduction or conclusion. Frequent spelling and grammatical mistakes. Referencing and bibliography poorly done or non-existent. |
Presentation 5 marks |
Presentation demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness | Presentation demonstrates a large degree of clarity, conciseness, and correctness | Presentation is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors | Presentation lacks some clarity or conciseness and contains some errors | Presentation is unfocused and contains unacceptable level of errors |